Mission Control — reports feed

The Intent OS operational platform, being designed in full before it is built. Start with the program status report — the current-state digest. The roadmap and constitution below carry the full plan.

Copies just the program status report (~6k characters) — the right-sized current-state summary, not the whole record.
Hand your AI this link and ask it to read the current state: https://demos.intentsolutions.io/mission-control/reports/2026-07-11-program-status-report.md
Want everything? The full record in one file is all-reports.md (large); the machine index is llms.txt, the changelog feed.md, and each report is under reports/. Security-sensitive operational documents are not published; published copies are redacted of identifiers and secrets.

Current state: the full platform is being designed before it is built

Read the Program Status Report first — it is the single digest of where Mission Control stands.

Mission Control (the Intent OS operational platform) is being architected in full before any code is written. The entire program — every phase, epic, and task — is being hand-authored as a governed backlog so the build proceeds from an approved design, not guesses. Progress is measured in *design*, not shipped features.

Where things stand today:

The constitution and the roadmap carry the full detail; the standards (metrics, definitions of done, architecture, governance) are the supporting reference.

Phase 0 complete: the governance foundation (archive)

Before authorizing a multi-year build, Phase 0 produced the governable reference package — the standing test being *"if the author disappeared tomorrow, could a new senior engineer run this?"* Filed and closed: the success metrics + KPIs, the four Definitions of Done, the layered architecture (when something is a repo vs a service vs a package vs a module), the decision index, a glossary, an explicit non-goals page, and the governance calendar + ownership matrix. These are the supporting standards the current build is designed against; the security-sensitive operational documents (topology, dependency and single-point-of-failure maps, the risk register) stay private.